❰Epub❯ ➟ Empowering Women in Russia: Activism, Aid, and NGOs (New Anthropologies of Europe) Author Julie Hemment – Horse-zine.co.uk

Empowering Women in Russia: Activism, Aid, and NGOs (New Anthropologies of Europe) explained Empowering Women in Russia: Activism, Aid, and NGOs (New Anthropologies of Europe), review Empowering Women in Russia: Activism, Aid, and NGOs (New Anthropologies of Europe), trailer Empowering Women in Russia: Activism, Aid, and NGOs (New Anthropologies of Europe), box office Empowering Women in Russia: Activism, Aid, and NGOs (New Anthropologies of Europe), analysis Empowering Women in Russia: Activism, Aid, and NGOs (New Anthropologies of Europe), Empowering Women in Russia: Activism, Aid, and NGOs (New Anthropologies of Europe) d2af Julie Hemment S Engrossing Study Traces The Development Encounter Through Interactions Between International Foundations And Russian Women S Groups During A Decade Of National Collapse Prohibited From Organizing Independently Under State Socialism, Women S Groups Became A Focus Of Attention In The Mid S For Foundations Eager To Promote Participatory Democracy, But The Version Of Civil Society That Has Emerged The Third Sector Is Far From What Russian Activists Envisioned And What Donor Agencies Promised Drawing On Ethnographic Methods And Participatory Action Research, Hemment Tells The Story Of Her Introduction To And Growing Collaboration With Members Of The Group Zhenskii Svet Women S Light In The Provincial City Of Tver

  • Paperback
  • 208 pages
  • Empowering Women in Russia: Activism, Aid, and NGOs (New Anthropologies of Europe)
  • Julie Hemment
  • English
  • 19 June 2019
  • 9780253218919

About the Author: Julie Hemment

Is a well-known author, some of his books are a fascination for readers like in the Empowering Women in Russia: Activism, Aid, and NGOs (New Anthropologies of Europe) book, this is one of the most wanted Julie Hemment author readers around the world.

10 thoughts on “Empowering Women in Russia: Activism, Aid, and NGOs (New Anthropologies of Europe)

  1. says:

    Julie Hemment s goals in her ethnography, Empowering Women in Russia, were outlined upfront for her readers She felt that she had a responsibility to those she researched, and wanted to achieve dialogic democratic research than she felt the academic community as a whole was doing during the 1990s and early 2000s She wanted to empower the marginalized with her research using collaboration in her participatory action research Her description of her tools and reasoning behind them enabled readers to critic and understand her work Hemment s approach gave her strong authority because she admitted her apprehensions on certain topics Hemment was able to admit she didn t know the answers or the correct ways to go about things and was able to talk her readers through her thought process in the same way she herself went through it She admitted having culture shock at points and that her initial reaction to her surroundings in Post Cold War Russia was that is was impoverished with an air of neglect.Hemment also grappled with tough concepts that she worked through during the duration of the book For instance, she uses the terms 3rd Sector and Civil Society as tools to explain the disconnect between the elites and the Russian population as a whole She says that the 3rd sector was created by international donors and was incomprehensible to most Russian people In a similar manner she talks about how Civil Society is everything that was not determined by the communist party but also was a catchall term Her readers understand that inserting western ideas or any ideas into the Russian culture is complicated.The readers were also given a historical outline to better understand the situation in Russia they are reading about This makes it easier to understand the complicated issues Hemment discusses She gives the readers the three phases of women s activism in Russia She gives her readers the outline so that they can better understand her experiences in the field that she explains throughout the book The transition from small groups of highly educated women documenting what their lives were like outside of what the party told them their lives were suppose to be like, to consciousness raising, to the eventual naming of problems that unified women s experiences, is important Hemment is able to uncover the feelings of disconnection from the state, struggles with moral issues, and hardships of women s everyday lives that drew people to activism Something that was also reiterated throughout the ethnography was how the movement was distant from real women People in Russia didn t understand the concept of gender or domestic violence because they never had to use it before They also didn t understand that they couldn t go to the state for help like they use to People didn t know the names of the problems that they were experiences let alone that there were other people going through the same things Hemment s ability to get those points across to American readers who never experiences or might not know about what people went through under socialism is impressive While depicting the two women s centers the point that stood out the most was how blind the international community was to local knowledge International support was inadequate and Hemment describes it beautifully as chasing the next donor fade, which at the beginning of her research was domestic violence and lined up nicely with her research but by the end, her informants began losing grants because sex trafficking was the new donor fade The International attention did open doors for Valentina and Oktiabrina because as leaders they were selected to travel to conferences, training sessions, and talks The attention Hemment spends on explaining what happened in a structural and humanistic sense to Valentina s Center for Women s History and Gender Studies and Oktiabrina s Crisis Center added a sense of reality to the ethnography The readers were able to see their struggles with playing the game the state and international donors wanted them to Hemment also shows how difficult simple things like getting a telephone put in for a hotline was for thes

  2. says:

    Empowering Women in Russia is a critical ethnography about power and politics by Julie Hemment published in 2007 As Hemment explains herself, the book is about the power dynamics that underlie researcher subject relations and about the politics surrounding researchers and the production of a specific kind of work Hemment begins with a detailed historical account of the evolution of Women sactivism in Russia since the fall of the Soviet Empire She explains how this evolution along with the region s specific history lead to a particular type of international involvement in the area, something she calls gendered interventions Hemment then talks about both the benefits and drawbacks of these types of interventions She highlights how women s activism in Russia took the international stage for the first time and boosted the fortunes of women s activism However the apparent legitimacy gained by this participation did not apply domestically Hemment explains this disconnect in part due to Russia s history the Family Code of 1918 in theory created one set of expectations for gender while in practice it did not meet those expectations, resulting in a problematic understanding of gender for Russian citizens that has carried on throughout the century Hemment also explains that the lack of a domestic legitimacy was also due to the identification of the period s women s activism as an elitist movement that expressed concerns of class than concerns of gender These factors along with the fall of the Soviet Union, what it meant in relation to capitalism and democracy, and how gender was mis understood in the process is what Hemment proposes to explore Specifically, she sets out to explore how international aid and intervention was conditioned according to inaccurate conceptions of local needs and how women s activism both countered and conformed to outside policies in order to maintain funding Aside from this and perhaps central to Hemment is the question of the relationship between researcher and subject in this case Julie Hemment and the women s group Zhenskii Svet, a small group founded in Tver in 1991 Hemment uses Participatory Action Research to provide a democratic and dialogic research encounter She writes in the first person and argues that the degree of reflexivity she uses in her approach is both a feminist concern and necessary of anthropology Hemment documents how she, as researcher, is implicated in the research project and also challenges the traditional power relationships that constitute researcher subject relations The latter is achieved by collaboration with the subjects of the ethnography, women s activists, specifically members of Zhenskii Svet Hemment s approach, her reflexivity and her involvement in research and activism all contribute to the production of a uniquely introspective and critical account of not only international aid, but also of women s activism by women for women and what the process entails I feel that Hemment s book may have left some disillusioned with international aid, funding and grants but it does leave the reader hopeful as to how this process will change Hemment s focus on process is critical for ethnographers who hope to enact and inspire activism through scholarship.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *